Often, these countries are the most open to trade. Even if a lefty does not further a leftist cause and merely profits from lefty content creations it is … So Vaush is a self-described "Leftist-Libertrarian" (Anarcho-Communist). Fortunately, he underlined that the Democrats would always be limited by their inherent drive and character, as it is bourgeois and cannot self-destruct or decimate the system it stands on. On January 3rd, 2021, Youtubers Hakim and Vaush held a live-streamed discussion on the latter’s channel under the title “SUPER CAPITALISM, talking w/ Hakim, weed & more!” which had an average of 15,000 live viewers. It is one perspective out of many, but still worth reading about. From here, the two connect the discussion to the reciprocal exploitation of the Third World (a term Hakim is hesitant to use) as Social Democracy develops, steering in the territory of Imperialism. We must once again recall Engels, writing in Anti-Dühring: “As long ago as 1844 I stated that the above-mentioned balancing of useful effects and expenditure of labour on making decisions concerning production was all that would be left, in a communist society, of the politico-economic concept of value.”. I broadcast livestreams where I do debates, cover current events, critique media, and generally try not to take it all too seriously. 5. These companies compete with other companies for business. Vaush considers “social-democrats who signal socialism” to be a step forward. Due to the above-given reasoning, I deemed it appropriate (with necessary permission) to write a critical summary and a general overview of the discussion that took place. Mussolini claimed that capitalism had degenerated in three stages, starting with dynamic or heroic capitalism (1830–1870), followed by static capitalism (1870–1914) and then reaching its final form of decadent capitalism, also known as supercapitalism beginning in 1914. Vaush Youtube ranking - PLAYBOARD Hi, I'm Vaush. Ian McCulloch - YTS - YIFY Movies - Torrent Download. It’s a jetpack. There could have very well been slip-ups, accidental mistakes and unintentional errors caused by anxiety, fatigue, misspeaking and so on. Information and translations of supercapitalism in the most comprehensive dictionary definitions resource on the web. To this, Hakim agrees and they conclude that the revolutionary potential of the working class has shifted southwards. Here, Hakim’s mistake was granting Vaush’s assertion that a revolution in America is 100% impossible validity. As globalization increases, it is easy to see the top examples of capitalism. equal representation according to votes, proportionality) which would improve the living standards of the US citizens and have more leverage over things like healthcare, student debt, etc. Most people don’t realize that industry leaders all have them today, inherited from their grandparents. monkas. Naturally, the conversation steers towards Reform or Revolution. Other than than, keeping all the errors in mind, nothing revolutionary or sensational took place, nor did either participants expect any such outcome. Hakim seems to have a more elaborate position on this topic vis-à-vis aligning interests and the national bourgeoisie, which we shall touch upon in Part II below. Hakim asserted that his personal views are that of a “Marxist-Leninist” but very curiously, he voiced that he “personally consider[s himself] a Libertarian too,” adding that while this is generally true, “when it comes to pragmatism… my Libertarianism has to be dulled.” We’re off to a rather peculiar start! What could that possibly be? The trend of civil discussion and broad agreement was maintained through the whole 2-hour-and-some stream, which brings us to the first minus of the whole endeavor: too little confrontation and critical examination of each other’s points. to get the correct sight of the conflicting parties’ stances. No one will be able to reach the same substance and level of understanding as a well-learned Marxist if they don’t engage with theory and simply depend on such “unorthodox ways” for these revelations to fall out of. Marx and Engels believed that in the course of revolutionary transformations, the transfer of the latest technologies from these states to the entire planet should be carried out. Besides the critical commentary, this is meant to be a summary more than anything, for those who were unable or unwilling to personally watch the stream. I posted a meme there once and I got yelled at for being lazy. Hakim repeats the classic Leninist position about electoralism, how it can be used as a “microphone” to spread Socialist ideas, raise awareness, etc. Hakim starts off discussing Lenin’s Imperialism by bringing up just the title of his work on the topic, to showcase that Imperialism is a stage of Capitalism, the highest one in fact. Read writing from The Acheron In Motion on Medium. It conveys the message perfectly, whereas bad propaganda is focused on vague ideological values like “hard work”, Hmm I do wonder if there is more PinkWug content on r/pinkwug what do you think u/pinkwug. In this regard, as America seemingly has none of the above (even though he later in the stream says that America has a “shit ton of” poor people), he is willing to settle on Social Democracy and to neuter the “militaristic institutions” of America to remove as many barriers from the “Global South” activating and being engulfed in waves of revolutionary action as possible. What doesn't get talked about much is the actual capitalism versus socialism debate we were supposed to have gotten. All-round dependence, this natural form of the world-historical cooperation of individuals, will be transformed by this communist revolution into the control and conscious mastery of these powers, which, born of the action of men on one another, have till now overawed and governed men as powers completely alien to them.’”, But when it comes to value, to borrow Bordiga’s expression, “one cannot let Stalin’s [Hakim’s here!] He doesn’t care about what Haz says or thinks but he pesters Haz for 6 hours last night on twitter. The rich got richer, and the super rich did even better. […] The libertarian-authoritarian “split” is nothing but semantics to protect one’s feelings, […] seen exclusively in online Marxist spaces.” [Timestamps: 4:10–5:00]. There is some margin of error, as I stayed up late to note down some phrases that were said in passing while listening to it live. Vaush falsely claims that “you should always be able to make an argument on your own, otherwise you’re engaging in a sort of dogmatism.” Falsely not because this notion is untrue, but because he tries to link this to theory. But the very mellow and at times dull flow of the conversation was much more fruitful in establishing personal respect than it was in clashing on obvious and unaddressed disagreements. […] Something truly apocalyptic has to happen. Vaush’s *NEW* “Super” Capitalism Economic System PragerU Releases - And I'm Not Kidding Here - a Pro-Slavery Video Vaush Reacts: Vaush Detractors (BadEmpanada, Hakim, \u0026 More) My experience of it has been a whole lot of the ol' anti-work doesn't meant anti-work, it means anti-work-under-neoliberal-capitalism. But this culminated in Dietzgen contacting Marx and becoming a Marxist, not furthering his philosophy by trying to continue on his individual path in the hopes of making another such discovery. Vaush argued: “Even in a post-scarcity society… I still get the feeling that we’re going to maintain that economic divide. From the above it is clear that the real intellectual wealth of the individual depends entirely on the wealth of his real connections. I believe progressive socialism is the best solution to the problems our country - all countries - face, and I'm here to make arguments in favor of that belief. Thus it’s important to concentrate less on the technical pedantry and more on the actual substance (but we shall do both!) Vaush /ˈvaʊʃ/ (or VaushV) is a socialist YouTuber and occasional troll who advocates for "pro-markets" libertarian socialism to replace capitalism as an economic system in the near future. But under super capitalism, people vote for who has the best jetpack-related ideas, and those people get to fly around and do what they were voted in to do. The network was obtained from Twitter on Friday, 01 January 2021 at 16:40 UTC. Of course, as we are aware, also taking in account the entire third section of the said book, a “communist society” operates with the socialist mode of production, nevertheless the stage. But rereading it, I believe there should be none. The stream certainly started off… interestingly. Both of them have shown to be able to generate online discourse, which then spreads to other “influencers” and “streamers” and these topics get transferred and passed around in much wider circles. Once again, we must not be deluded enough to consider this a substantial contribution to global workers’ struggles, nor does it constitute “theory.” But dominating and controlling the information inflow-outflow, as well as the discourse online is not an easy feat, nor an irrelevant one. I hope to have sufficiently showcased the positive and negative aspects of both parties and their arguments. The tweets in the network were tweeted over the 2-day, 15-hour, 47-minute period from … Both seem to agree to the idea that a revolution in the first world is very improbable, and Vaush aggressively asserts that perhaps only the “Global South” has the capacity and the ability to carry out revolutions in this day and age. Second, Bernie came behind Hillary in one election cycle, but as a result of many years of campaigns and organization, which means that we cannot chalk this up to a result from a single cycle. At the very same time, there is a message in the chat from a certain “pixelk” saying: “God, defund the CIA and destroy american imperialism,” clearly showcasing the surface-level and infantile approach to American Imperialism many “libsocs” have. He is led to introducing the notion of Labor Aristocracy “as Lenin, Marx and Engels termed it.” A slight technical and very pedantic correction here would obviously be that Marx never implicitly used such terminology and it was only Engels who used “Labor Aristocracy” after Marx’s death, after which Kautsky helped popularize it and it was adopted by Lenin in his analyses of Imperialism. Yet, I encourage the readers, as always, to read critically and check the original sources themselves if in doubt. One thing we can undoubtedly say is that the whole endeavor was… interesting. He claims that he “arrived at the idea of class antagonism before reading about it directly” which shouldn’t be surprising at all, as according to Marx himself: “And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. According to Vaush, criminality helps us understand where there are faults in society. The tweets in the network were tweeted over the 2-day, 15-hour, 47-minute period from … Per Reich, greed is not at fault, nor are the super rich, under supercapitalism. Vaush is a bit special because he is one of the few leftists willing to respond to right-wing talking points on race and stuff. Anything from the Democratic Party to the CPUSA can belong to this broad spectrum and its elevation doesn’t in itself benefit us or the working class. ... it's Drunken Peasants left streamer Vaush debating Doug. xanderhal twitter, The best 'Pipeline' images and discussions of September 2020. Without further ado, before the Acheron drags us into the Hadean Chasms for eternity, let us begin our examination. Vaush’s *NEW* “Super” Capitalism Economic System. Hakim raised a point about the European-style Parliamentarianism (e.g. Let us not anathemize this word and concept. uh a car triggers outrage by being female and star Wars. 1 month ago. share. Precisely, Lenin wrote a few months before the October Revolution, both to his wife and publicly as a lecture, that he would likely not get to see a revolution in his lifetime. Supercapitalism was a concept that was developed in Italian Fascism. They hate communism more than they love capitalism I think. And Vaush’s view is preconditioned on the notion that Socialism will indeed never take root, as doing so would sublate any divides and inequalities where the so-called “social and economic” are concerned. wow, i will be sure to check that out, totally not pinkwug! We speak to author Ben Burgis on the importance of narratives from medicare for all, to Q Anon, to Vaush's so called 'Super Capitalism', and the Capitol protest.Ben Burgis is a philosophy professor at Georgia State University Perimeter College and the author of the best-selling "Give Them An Argument: Logic for the Left." While having fun, ideally. now you are speaking my language ! Vaush real name. For Vaush, the characteristic that makes Democrats a preferable alternative is that they can still be swayed to be “actually progressive” whereas the Republicans are an existential threat, thus it is a virtue to keep them out of the office. Hakim wraps up with: “Reformism is generally a dead end… especially in the imperial core countries, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have its uses according to the material conditions. […] they are vaguely left wing. The matter is rather easy: Socialism or Imperialism, as Luxemburg declared (yes, this is separate from the Socialism or Barbarism slogan). This reminds me of that old ContraPoints video where she remakes the cover of Tabby's Marx Engels Reader. I will leave judging this unfavourable situation to the readers. But it is just as empirically established that, by the overthrow of the existing state of society by the communist revolution (of which more below) and the abolition of private property which is identical with it, this power, which so baffles the German theoreticians, will be dissolved; and that then the liberation of each single individual will be accomplished in the measure in which history becomes transformed into world history. Vaush / ˈ v aʊ ʃ / (or VaushV) is an American socialist YouTuber and occasional troll who advocates for "pro-markets" libertarian socialism to replace capitalism as an economic system in the near future. He is fast talking, but the shit he is pushing, despite sounding smart, is actually really dumb. Reply. Vaush has claimed to always be fairly left-wing, though at one point he identified as a libertarian. […] It is always about the material conditions.” Well, not wrong, but the typical Leninist position about electoralism that the author believes to be outdated and even misguided today, is still present, which is not surprising or catastrophic. Im Kapitalismus werden erfolgreiche Unternehmer reicher und reicher: Sie kaufen von dem Geld, das sie einnehmen, immer neue Maschinen, Werkzeuge – oder andere … For Vaush, the chances of revolutionaries taking to the streets (at least for now) in America is “laughable, a joke, it’s never ever gonna happen,” Hakim chiming in with “and I agree.” Vaush sees the resurgence of class consciousness and the orchestration of coups such as “the business plot back in 1920s America” as an “excuse or a means” for radical change. This skewed view has two errors: first, there is no uniform determinant or measure of what “left-wing politics” is or how it is on the rise. He crowns this “revelation” by underlining the need for “the aesthetics that work.” This culminates in the “synthesis of the meaningful things [reform and revolution].” We get repurposed Bernstein of the 21st century espousing these wisdoms to thousands of teenagers online. Open Letter to Vaush + All Consumption Under Capitalism is Unethical Defence Vegan message board for support on vegan related issues and questions. Cookies help us deliver our Services. And, tbh, that part of the debate was boring. The major benefit of this discussion, however, was exposing the “fanbase” of both sides to diverse ideas, opinions and propositions. So this was the reaction to uh Gina's introduction to the Mandalorian. Coming to an end, Vaush offers a description of “supercapitalism,” a concept which isn’t new but has been repackaged and trending online since 2021 began: “[It’s] twisting the definition of capitalism… “everyone gets private ownership now”… to the point where you’re actually extolling socialism using capitalist aesthetics, you actually get a socialist society that calls itself capitalism. u/downloadvideo. They decide which goods and services to provide. Vaush is an American left-wing YouTuber known for his advocacy for socialism and debates with other youtubers, most notably Sargon Of Akkad and Destiny. Vaush chimes in to remind the audience that “One of the greatest enemies we have for global socialism is [nationalism],” a pleasantly surprising declaration (Rosa Luxemburg is clapping from the heavenly clouds). Unfortunately, we have no space or ambition right here, right now, to argue against such a position. The graph represents a network of 2,297 Twitter users whose recent tweets contained "#SuperCapitalism", or who were replied to or mentioned in those tweets, taken from a data set limited to a maximum of 18,000 tweets. i mean i guess venting in the discord didnt help. Edit: I had around 5-7 videos in this thread, all banned in just 6 months. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Meaning of supercapitalism. We don't. Alternative Hypothesis did a video on him. However, given the fact that these two figures have more than 375,000 subscribers taken together, it must be said that they exert a limited, but an influence nevertheless. It has always been a dream of mine to channel my creative interests - political rhetoric, debate, media critique, illustration - into a vehicle through which I can change minds and improve some infinitesimally small corner of our beautiful world. 5 investments Democrats must make to win young voters, Trump Continues his Dangerous Rhetoric Toward People with Disabilities, Human Rights Not Just For Conservative Christians, Alex Azar is big pharma personified. Biden signs executive actions on coronavirus response, including invoking Defense Production Act "to direct all federal agencies and private industry to accelerate the making of everything that's needed to protect, test, vaccinate, and take care of our people." Trending posts and videos related to Pipeline! These days, given the crisis facing capitalism, some might long for real superheroes. If you can’t provide a supply and have no resources to be part of the demand, then you’re not needed. Businesses will eventually consolidate in a pure form of Capitalism until only one provider is available in the market. Libertarian Socialism With Authoritarian Characteristics, How to be a liberal-socialist-conservative. Hakim and Vaush continued the discussion with implicitly talking about utopianism and explicitly mentioning “the ideal.” According to the two, the obvious ideal would be a peaceful, bloodless transfer of power from the bourgeoisie to the proletariat for the “establishment” of the desired system (yes, we are keeping in mind the “is not a state of affairs” quote). Suppose even in a fully socialist world, these sort of things will still exist and they would require to be combatted, it would require the active deindustrialization of the imperial core and the active (re)industrialization… of the [global south] to equalize the level of productive capacity… to develop the productive forces.”.
Meatballs 3 Trailer, Mexican Dwarf Crayfish For Sale, Le Fishe 1 Year, Shop Arq Sizing, Is Lee Westwood Still With Helen Storey, Sway Calloway Net Worth,
Recent Comments